From idea to Kickstarter – enamel pins

One day in the lab my friend Andrew briefly mentioned that someone he knew had kickstarted cute enamel pins, this idea firmly planted itself in my brain. Could I produce microbiology enamel pins?

The idea quickly became too big when I started to imagine not one. Not two. But 6 designs…

For every bacterium I wanted to highlight interesting features. Caulobacter has the lifestyle switch between swarmer cells and stalked cells. Bacillus has spores and asymmetric division. Streptomyces are mycelial with long spore chains. In Staphylococcus aureus I showed the secretion systems. In Vibrio cholerae I highlight the chemotaxis array. E.coli is our lab workhorse with a cute flask.

Buuut… six pins are way too expensive to produce. So I asked Twitter which ones people liked most! I thought that this would help me reduce the number of samples but they were all well-liked. Now what?… I ended up finishing 5 out of the six designs and made a set of mockups. Note, they have not been produced yet. I went heavy with photoshop to produce an image of what they *would* look like.

There are several reasons I am excited about pins and wearable images of bacteria. First is because I love them and think they are cute. But second, normally bacteria are invisible. This contributes to most of the population not really knowing what to think about when we talk about bacteria, but at most imagining some scary illness. I believe that visualising the invisible world can help the general understanding of science. How can we expect people to understand what we are talking about if they don’t have an image to form in their mind?

At the time of writing this, my project is under review by Kickstarter and I hope to launch it the 8th of January, 2021! It will run for a month, until the 8th of February, and I will order a crazy amount of pins if it all works out!

Thank you all for supporting my journey as a Science artist, I can’t wait to see how this will work out!

OMG, I did a Stand-Up!

Can you believe it, I did some Science Stand-Up!

Bright Club training is organised by the LIFE Science Centre and I would highly recommend it! Not only is it fun to look at science from a completely different perspective (our job is really weird and funny) but the things you learn for comedy are directly translatable to lectures and science communication. And of course, how cool is it to have performed at an actual comedy club?

Performing with Bright club was an amazing experience and I am looking forward to the next Science communication opportunity!

Science in the Summer!

In science, we often focus our attention on research. This makes sense and is completely obvious, but science involves more than pipetting and coding. In fact, most – if not all – of the communication of our work will be conveyed in writing for scientific journals. How often have we not been staring at a paper wondering what the author was actually trying to do, and why this is impactful?

This is exactly why I wanted to follow the science communication summer school.

The 5-day summer school gave us background knowledge on the history of science communication and different approaches which do (or don’t) work. We enjoyed a great set of lectures by people who communicate science in several different ways, be it citizen science, writing a book, making television shows, or working for the university as a communication officer. What does it take to write a book and what does it get you? How do you talk about science on television and which events should you definitely skip?

Summer school Science Communication, Leiden 2019

For me, the most valuable aspects of the summer school were the practical ones. We got some very solid insights on how to incorporate public engagement in grant applications, an amazing writing workshop by Lisette van Hulst ( and a hands-on presenting workshop by Julia Cramer. Writing sounds so easy, we do it all the time. Yet it was so useful to have a lecture on the proper construction of sentences and stories. Where is the verb? Last time I had a class like this was at least 15 years ago. It’s useful to revisit basic English, especially for non-native speakers. Lisette asked us to look at our own work and correct it, based on a few simple guidelines. Truly, I felt a bit embarrassed to see very typical mistakes. During the presenting workshop, Julia focused on all the things we normally don’t talk about. Most of our presenting workshops in science are about powerpoint slides and how to talk about our results and conclusions. But we rarely talk about when and where we walk during presentations, where to leave all those limbs (I never know what to do with my arms), or when to put vocal emphasis on a statement. 

These practical workshops were only the start, as Anne and Julia also asked us to spend a few hours to design a ‘product’ to communicate a specific scientific problem. Here again, we discussed issues that I had not properly considered before. Usually, when I wrote blogs, I wonder what I would like to write about. This is wrong. I should have wondered what people like to read about. For someone as highly educated as I am – I felt quite stupid.

I can only encourage scientists to follow the next science communication summer school, regardless of whether you have ambitions to spend a lot more time on science communication. It’s useful for every scientist to know how to engage an audience and to communicate our work. This is literally our job.

Thank you Anne Land and Julia Cramer for an amazing summer school!

Let’s talk about Science

I made a mistake.

This summer I am allowed to join an amazing Science Communication workshop hosted by the Leiden University and in my motivational letter, I promised that I would start to regularly blog about science if I would be selected. Whelp, now I’ve got to do this. As a warm-up, I will share a part of my motivational letter below:

Without gravity, there would be no anus. Why? Read this motivational letter to find out.

At some point, I heard about an experiment where chicken eggs were taken along on a space mission to look at the effects of space travel on embryonic development. The experiment with chicken eggs showed that chicken eggs fertilised 7 and 10 days before a space mission grew to be healthy chicks, whereas eggs fertilized on the day of the mission died. (Suda T, et al (1994) FEBS letters 340;34-38) This means that –somehow- gravity is essential for fertilization or embryonic development.

This space fact has fascinated me for years because of the implications for evolution on Earth. Everything on this planet has evolved with gravity and it’s difficult to predict which processes are dependent on it – we cannot simply switch it off and experiment with it.

This is an interesting scientific fact, but it was excellent scientific communication which allowed it to reach me. This is exactly something I want to learn, to recognise interesting and impactful science and to help it reach people.

At the moment I am working as a Postdoctoral scientist in an excellent institute, this gives me the opportunity to publish papers and consider my future scientific career. And wherever my future scientific career goes, I will need to talk about science and convince both my scientific field and laymen of the impact of my work. More important, I greatly enjoy science communication and I would like to spend more time doing this.

As a dedication to you, if you allow me to follow the summer school then I will start my blog in June.

Now why wouldn’t there be an anus without gravity? The solution to this mystery found me years later at a scientific conference. My friend at the dinner table mentioned that chicken embryos spin around in the egg, placing the yolk on one side of the blastoderm, a disc of cells. This helps to decide on the front and the back of the embryo. So without gravity there would be no anus and no healthy chicken. (Kochav S M , Eyal-Giladi H(1971)Science;171:1027–1029)